Charity at Home
Written by Administrator Thursday, 10 June 2010 17:36
Studies over the last several years find that the majority of Americans, somewhere around 60%, do not have wills. However, 100% of all Americans have estate planning! That is, if you do not have a will or trust, the state will divide up and distribute your possessions for you. The state, of course, will have a claim in it.
One of the inevitable events in our life will be our death (unless the Lord comes during our lifetime), yet one of the most difficult subjects to bring up with family, friends and donors is death and estate planning. It seems to us callous and insensitive. However, this is far from the truth. The Church fathers remind us to keep death before us daily. It makes sense that if most of us have managed our finances during our lifetime, why would we want someone else to manage them after we die? Yet, the majority of us seem OK with that.
I have always believed that what happens after we die (i.e. our funeral, our estate distribution, etc) should reflect how we have lived or better. If we have tithed during our life, why shouldn’t we tithe after we die? Why do so many assume that everything should go to our children? Someone said, “Love your children enough not to give them everything.” Not infrequently, I have seen children arguing over the will. I am saddened when I think of these parents looking down from heaven and seeing their children suing each other and not speaking to each other over what they have left behind!
There is a hard hitting scenario that challenges our attitudes about where our wealth should go. I can’t recall where I first heard it, but it goes something like this… If we really believe that God has given us everything, that we truly possess nothing, then we correctly view ourselves as “stewards” of what has been given us. I like the word “managers” better because it is a word we relate to more in our culture. If God is the owner and we are the managers, then what store manager would have the right to give the store’s possessions to his children after he dies? The store belongs to the owner, not the manager. The owner has given the manager a salary to run his store, to build it up, yet in the end; the store belongs to the owner. This is an incredible way to start thinking about what we have. It really belongs to God. It really should be His to distribute…according to His will.
If our life is a preparation for our death, then why are we so reluctant to take care of what God has given us and where it will go? Did not the Lord do this on the Cross with His mother? We need to be prepared and make sure we are good stewards both in this life and after. It is our last act of management. May our will, reflect His will…
Written by Administrator Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:57
How the Ministry of FOCUS North America can produce Spiritual and Financial Growth in the Orthodox Church
Changing the Hearts, Minds and Philanthropic Habits of the Orthodox Faithful
History:
1. The “Ellis Island” immigrants of the early 1900’s had a direct experience with poverty in their homelands and the Great Depression in the U.S. They were often the poor and jobless, or their contact with such was no farther removed than their next door neighbor. They were the “poor helping the poor.”
2. The second wave of Immigrants after WWII also had a direct experience with poverty either during WWII or their own national civil war. They also moved into the inner cities in the U.S. where poverty and need were again next door.
3. By in large the current generation has far less direct experience with poverty. While we have become the one of the wealthiest groups in America, we have also for the most part moved out from the neighborhoods where poverty exists. Our “knowledge” of poverty is through the media or passing by the homeless person. While we have remained “charitable,” our charity for the most part has been writing checks, not direct contact with the poor as past generations experienced. While many churches groups assist in “soup kitchens” across the country, seldom do they sit down and engage in a real and sustained relationship with the poor.
Change:
1. Real “philanthropia” involves “friendship,” a direct relationship with those less fortunate, as previous generations had experienced. When we have a real and deep relationship (communion) with the person of Christ in the poor, we and they are transformed. First, suffering no matter where it occurs, either next door or on the other side of the world becomes real and not just a story. Second, the person who benefits from the charity knows he has a friend who returns his dignity as person and icon of Christ. It actually changes his/her brain chemistry to feel loved again. We who directly help the poor through this relationship will also take a hard look at our wealth and spending habits. With a more thankful spirit, we too can become less materialist and more charitable. Often ignored, Isaiah describes the “acceptable fast” as one in which we share our bread with the hungry. Fasting is not just doing away with harmful passions or not eating certain foods, but learning to be charitable. Charity then holds a place along with fasting and control of the passions as major disciplines in the Orthodox Christian life.
2. Studies show the more we learn to be charitable, the more we will be charitable to everyone. Unfortunately, many of us abide by the myth that “we fight over the same dollar.” This is contrary to the scriptural and liturgical tradition of our Orthodox church in which we pray that God “multiplies” the gifts (in the Artoclasia) and remains (of the table). We perceive ourselves as “fighting” over the “remains”, instead of asking God to multiply them and giving people the opportunity to give as they should. Can we still experience the miracle of the feeding of five thousand?
3. As I travel, I am finding that young people especially are not identifying with the building of buildings and the institutions of the Church. They are attracted to the “hands on” work of helping those around them. Encountering Christ outside the walls of the Church in the poor will keep them in the church, the very thing their parents and clergy have prayed for. This combined with a return to the correct teaching of tithing and giving offerings will bring many blessings to our Church.
4. God has wired us to give, to be like Him. This also holds true for our Churches. The more the Church reaches out to those beyond her walls, the more the faithful will love and care for their church. If they perceive a church only concerned about Her, they will give less. This country is experiencing serious economic depression, joblessness and poverty. If our Church leadership does not respond to this crisis in our own backyard, the Church herself will be inconsistent with the philanthropic tradition of our Church Fathers and eventually our faithful will ask “why?”
5. The direct contact with the poor that FOCUS North America seeks to bring us by asking us to sit down and establishing a relationship (communion) with the poor will reestablish the very likeness of God in us and them. Taking “ownership” of problem of poverty in America will reestablish us as the Church of our fathers and put us on the map for caring about our own country. The raising of money and giving it to other Churches or agencies to help the poor is really only depriving us of the very experience that can transform our hearts, minds and philanthropic giving.
Quotes from Studies:
1. Images or visuals of one person in need engendered more sympathy and funds than statistics about a particular issue or disaster. In several case studies, donors gave more to a charity when they read or heard about one individual as opposed to two or more, or when informed about a particular issue or situation. Donors are more likely to contribute to someone about whom they knew one fact than to someone who they knew nothing about. This “friend of the victim” phenomenon can be helpful for charities using celebrity spokespersons or other people who assist in their fundraising. In the study, the one fact the potential donors knew was where the person would like to visit in the world. Individuals are more likely to spread out their support to several charities than simply give it all to one organization. Charities may be able to capitalize on this trend by offering donors different ways to give and different programs to support. The research was reported at a recent conference at Princeton University. "Experimental Approaches to the Study of Charitable Giving" was funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and sponsored by Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
2. Want larger donations? Ask Donors First to Volunteer (June 9, 2008) A recent study published by the University of California, Berkeley, shows that people who are asked to give of their time before they are asked to donate will ultimately give more money to that charity… In one experiment, each participant was told briefly about the mission of a charity (the American Lung Cancer Foundation) and notified of an upcoming event for the cause. Then one group was asked how much time they would volunteer to the cause followed by the question of how much money they would donate. The second group was only asked how much money they would donate. The experiment found that those who were asked to donate only money, pledged to give $24.46 on average; whereas those who were first asked to volunteer their time pledged an average donation of $36.44. Other experiments were carried out that backed up the hypothesis that asking one for their time as a volunteer before asking them to donate will result in higher overall giving amounts. The researchers explain their results by proposing that when a person is asked for money in the beginning, that person will approach the decision in terms of maximizing value, focusing on the tangible returns of the investment. Since this calculation is more difficult than measuring the personal happiness that comes from supporting a cause, less money will be given at the end. In other words, the initial request frames the way people evaluate how much they want to donate.
3. Data from Helping Out shows that there is a relationship between giving time and giving money. The majority of respondents are engaged in both activities. Furthermore, participation in one activity is positively correlated with the other, with active volunteers giving more money than non-volunteers. On a personal and social level, the giving of both time and money are valuable activities. However, data from Helping Out suggests that time is perhaps seen to be a more precious commodity than money. From “Helping Out: A National Survey of Volunteering and Charitable Giving (2007)”
4. Volunteering produces health benefits? While Americans may be divided about volunteering, those that do contribute their time often find themselves in better health, according to a recent study from the Corporation for National and Community Service. The Health Benefits of Volunteering: a Review of Recent Research reviews a collection of scientific research and finds a significant connection between volunteering and good health. According to the research, volunteers have greater longevity, higher functional ability, lower rates of depression and less incidence of heart disease. The study documents major findings from more than 30 rigorous and longitudinal studies that reviewed the relationship between health and volunteering with particular emphasis on studies that seek to determine the causal connection between the two factors. The studies found that volunteering leads to improved physical and mental health. Research suggests that volunteering is particularly beneficial to the health of older adults and those serving 100 hours annually. Two studies found that the volunteering threshold for health benefits is about 100 hours per year or about two hours a week. Individuals who reached this threshold enjoyed significant health benefits.
Last Updated on Thursday, 18 February 2010 17:38 Written by Administrator Thursday, 18 February 2010 15:39
I had the blessing of going with my son and some friends from the Rochester parish to the Metropolis of Chicago – Western Region Basketball Tournament in Kansas City two weeks ago. Since I was at the national headquarters of FOCUS North America, I wanted them to see what I did for a living. On Friday night, we went to our Reconciliation Services – Focus Kansas City Center (which also serves as our home office) to serve a meal to the homeless. Evan (my son) asked me, “What do I do?” I said, “Get a plate and give it to someone, and sit down and talk with them.” He said, “Sit down and talk?” I said “Yes, that is the Lord Jesus Christ sitting there. What are you going to do? Slop his food in front of Him and take off?” He did it. He ended up visiting with two different people. One he talked baseball with for a long time. Afterwards he told me how much it changed his impression about many things.
Meanwhile, I met a man whom I will call “C”. C had booze on his breath, and for some reason, even though I was wearing sweat pants and a sweat shirt, he knew I was some kind of clergy. I asked how he knew, and he said God told him. C and I joked with each other for a long time. We were having a blast when he finally he told me what had happened to him; it was drugs, then a lost job, and then a lost family. When C is ready he will go upstairs at our center and meet with Fr. Paisius or other counselors and start to get his life back. I think this will be soon. As C was leaving, he hugged me and said that I was one good m***** f*****. I said, “Thanks”; it was the greatest compliment anyone ever gave me.
Later that weekend, Ari, the friend from our parish told me about his experience. He said all my talking and presentations about FOCUS North America were not that effective. Even our DVD was nothing compared to this real experience of serving the homeless. That was my greatest insult, but I welcomed it.
As you can see, the most effective way to reach a person is through friendship. At the recommendation of many people, I saw three good movies this last month; “The Soloist”, “Precious” and “The Blindside”. What all three movies witness to is the importance of friendship and the effect it can have on those in need. All the programs and monetary funding in the world will never replace someone who cares, takes a chance and becomes a friend. Miracles can even happen as we saw in the true story behind the movie, “The Blindside.” My bet is that most of the people we saw that night in Kansas City probably had a family who also tried and tried to help but eventually gave up on them. Many probably had given up on themselves. But now what? What will happen to them? Whose “problem” will they be now? They have become “the least” that the Lord talks about in Matthew 25.
This is the essence of what FOCUS North America is all about. Yes, we would love more programs; yes, we would love more money, but what we really want is you and them to become friends. And here is the real mystery…you will benefit from it most! Below I have passed along what the others experienced that night serving the homeless…
Fr. Nick,
I wanted to express my humble and a sincere thank you to everyone involved in FOCUS North America. I had the opportunity to help serve meals on a snowing cold night in Kansas City last Friday. Although I have thankfully and with God's grace been able to help serve people in need before, this was the first time I had experienced this type of event. I was overwhelmed with how happy and uplifting the atmosphere was. My two daughters and my wife along with a family from our church volunteered together. I hope and pray that God's message of helping those in need continues to be part of my family’s future. Upon finishing the evening, I took a moment to pray. I prayed for God to keep his spirit and strength in everyone there, and I prayed for God to hold a special place for his children in need in His kingdom. Finally, I wanted to apologize for eating so many cookies that were set aside for the homeless, I just couldn’t help it…
John – 40 years old
Fr. Nick,
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to help out the people who are less fortunate than we are. When I got to the soup kitchen, I saw the people and I instantly realized that what we did for them helped them so much. Those people didn't have much, and when we helped them and gave them food, it made me realize how lucky I was to have what I have. This experience was wonderful, and it made me change my state of mind about many things.
Theoni – 12 years old
Fr. Nick
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to volunteer at the Kansas City soup kitchen. It was so much fun to help out and see a different side of our world that I hadn’t really experienced before. And I was so surprised to see that all of these starving people still had smiles on their faces. I definitely want to help out again.
Deanna – 14 years old
Written by Administrator Wednesday, 23 December 2009 17:15
The sign which hung above this area read “RECOMBOBULATION AREA.” As I just now typed the word, it didn’t make it through my computer’s spell check. When I right clicked on it, it had no suggestions. I had heard of the word “discombobulated” before which I looked up in the dictionary. The meaning was “upset, confused, or frustrated.” Then I looked up “recombobulation” there was no such word. You have to hand it to the Cheeseheads in Milwaukee for coming up with this very creative and amazingly accurate word to describe what happens after an airport security checkpoint. In short, we are putting ourselves back together.
Isn’t this what the great feast of Christmas and our New Year’s resolutions are all about? Of course the word we use in our Orthodox Church is “repentance.” I am not suggesting a new ecclesiastical word to replace “repentance,” but it seems in this fast paced world where we do feel so hurried, confused, upset and frustrated – “recombobulation” does create a great image of what we must often do to return to God. In an article about the sign in the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel it was reported that,
“Max Wescoe of San Diego laughed when he saw the sign. It was a moment worthy of snapping a picture on his cell phone. ‘I've seen plenty of discombobulation areas,’ he said, talking both about airport travel and life. He now knows the one place he can come to do something about it. ‘I thought they put that up just for me,’ he said.”
I pray that as we celebrate the great Feast of Christmas and create New Year resolutions that the words of Max Wescoe become our words! May our Churches become the real area of “recombobulation” in our lives.
Please remember FOCUS North America during this festal season and help us serve those less fortunate than us.
![]()
Fr. Nick Kasemeotes
Last Updated on Monday, 24 August 2009 19:27 Written by Nick Kasemeotes Friday, 14 August 2009 00:55
Since FOCUS North America has come on the scene with the hope of furthering the efforts of Orthodox Christians to help those in need in America, one might ask are we just one more Orthodox agency competing for the very "limited" resources available to the Church. To state it simply, is FOCUS North America in some sort of competition with local churches, the archdioceses and other Orthodox social agencies to raise money to continue their ministries. The assumption here is that there is a limited “pie”, and with the entry of FOCUS North America on the scene, this means that the more of this pie we take, the less others will have. Let’s take a closer look at this concern.
The last time (correct me if I am wrong) an accurate study of giving in Orthodox Church was done was about 25 years ago. That study, looking only at the Greek Archdiocese, revealed that the average family giving to the Church was around .5%. That is, on a national level our faithful were giving only one half of one percent to their Church. I believe the national average for all Churches (non-orthodox as well) was about 2.5%. To offer an example, an Orthodox family with an income of $40,000 per year was only giving $200 to their Church every year. Our hope was that if we only could get our faithful to give the national average of 2.5%, we would increase our income 5 times from what it was. Another example, the income of a Church bringing in $50,000 a year in stewardship would increase to $250,000 if we simply gave in the same way as our next door neighbors gave to their Church. The ripple effect of this small change would have tremendous impact throughout our Church.
What ever happened to the "Tithe and Offerings"
For a long time, I have felt that the Old Testament, New Testatment and Patristic tradition of tithing should get more attention in our Churches...not just for sake of financial gain, but also for us to experience a deeper sense of worship and commitment. When we look around and see the tremendous programs of non-orthodox churches that practice tithing, we become envious. In the Old Testament, we see the people of Israel offered their tithe (10% of their yearly fruits) for the safekeeping of the tabernacle and care of the priests who served there. It was also an act of worship, another important subject. I have asked many Orthodox for many years, what has changed? Are we not the New Israel? Do we not still have houses of worship to care for and priests who serve them? Why are we not tithing, or better put, surpassing the tithe in our new freedom in Christ? Freedom means doing more than what we once did out of obligation. And we shouldn’t forget about the “offerings”. This was “above and beyond” the tithe. These were special offerings given for special seasons and occasions. To apply it to today and try to keep it simple: our tithe should go towards our local church, our offerings should be given on special occasions and for special purposes.
Dispelling the Myth…
Having said all of this, the problem we face in the Church is not “limited resources,” it is “unchallenged resources.” I hope the following numbers would sway us. The medium income for a family in the U.S. is around $50,000 per year (half make more, half make less). Based on this, if each Orthodox family began tithing, it would result in an average giving of $5,000 a year to their Church. The average income of a parish of 100 families would be $500,000! I’m sure this would please our church treasurers as well as our national financial officers. There would be an abundance not only to run our local Churches, but to support the administration, seminaries and social ministries that are so underfunded today. Moses once told the people of Israel to stop giving when they brought too many gifts for the building of the tabernacle. They did this in the desert, why can’t we do it in the richest country in the world? Could you imagine your priest announcing to the congregation, please stop giving, we have too much!
One of the reasons I took the job of Philanthropy Coordinator for FOCUS North America, is not only do I believe with all my heart in the mission of FOCUS North America, but I also believe we have not really challenged each other as Orthodox Christians to give as we should. My apologies again to the non-Greeks, but a national survey came out several months ago and revealed that Greek Americans were now the second most successful ethnic group in America. We have a very healthy number of names listed in Forbes “400 Richest Americans.” Many of us who have been blessed with much (by world standards, an over abundance) worked hard for it, but we also know that much will be expected of us. The Lord was not afraid to challenge the rich young ruler who came to him. He asked him to sell everything and give it to the poor and come follow him.
On a related subject, there are estimates that in the next 20 years or so about 40 trillion dollars will be handed from one generation to the next. Certainly our Orthodox faithful hold a portion of this. Have we been challenged to leave some of this for charitable works? Do we have Orthodox “Warren Buffets” who will rise up and care about the world around them (and love their children enough not to give them everything)?
Another myth… If someone gives to “X”, he will reduce his giving to “Y”.
For years, we had the blessing of having a very successful businessman in our parish. He was also very faithful in his Church attendance and cared about the Church. He also represented a disproportionately large percentage of our annual stewardship income. When he told me that he was considering joining the Leadership 100 program of our Archdiocese (a $10,000 gift per year for 10 years), I was afraid that he would reduce his giving to our Church. Boy was I wrong! His involvements with Leadership 100 among other things only led to his increased giving to our local Church and eventually a million dollar gift for our Church building project. There are studies in philanthropic giving which indicate as one becomes more and more charitable; one will expand their charitable giving to many charities.
Instead of furthering the myth that we are all in some sort of competition for “limited resources”, we should be encouraging all our faithful to be more charitable - period, to any worthy cause. It will eventually help us all!
Last Updated on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 14:28 Written by Nick Kasemeotes Tuesday, 21 July 2009 21:24
I am overjoyed when I hear someone say, “The more I give, the more I seem to receive.” Does this always happen? Is there a direct correlation between giving and receiving? Can this become a motivation for giving? This is what we will discuss in this blog… How does giving affect us?
In the Old Testament Book of Malachi, God through the prophet Malachi admonishes the people of Israel for “robbing” Him that is, not giving their tithe (giving 10%) and offerings. If they return to this practice His promise is to open for them “the windows of heaven and pour out such blessing that there will not be room enough to receive it.” Certainly even God implies that the very act of giving back to Him will result in His blessings.
It seems that giving for many people (if they give at all) is the predicated on the reverse principle. That is, the more I receive, the more I will give.” Arthur Brooks, the author of the book Gross National Happiness, took the challenge to investigate the dynamics of giving. He, like most of us, started with the assumption that people who make more money tend to give more money away. What surprised him in his studies is that he found the reverse to be true. That is, the more we give away, the more we seem to make. Sounds a bit like Malachi!
How does this work? Briefly, something like this… The more we give or volunteer, the happier we are. The happier we are, the harder and better we work. The harder and better we work, the more money we tend to make. To quote Brooks,
“Charitable giving and volunteering are tremendously pleasurable. They also empower givers, making them feel less like victims, and give people a lot of meaning in their lives. I have talked to clinical psychologists who actually prescribe volunteer work to their patients, with amazing results. Studies also show that givers are admired and elevated to positions of influence and authority. It is hardly surprising, given all the evidence, that givers enjoy (on average) higher happiness and prosperity than non-givers do. In fact, my research leads me to the belief that the single best self-help strategy is to serve others.”
It seems that not only the Bible, but even modern scientific research leads us to this conclusion; God has wired us to give! Being created in His image and likeness among other things means that when we give we are and become more like Him! The act of giving and doing for others actually change our brain chemistry and give us joy. Then why do more people not give? Why do some people remain stingy, not giving anything away to help others? I have no answer. Everything I read would point to the opposite.
In the field of charitable fundraising, we often hear that for someone to offer a large gift it takes great time, cultivation, spiritual maturity, etc. At a recent Mayo seminar on charitable giving, the speaker (a major gift development officer, who has asked people literally for millions of dollars) said something very shocking yet consistent with what we are discussing. He found that the very act of giving is THE life changing event for most donors. The people who have offered major gifts to Mayo have started to live a life with more meaning and depth than before.
There are so many wonderful causes that we can choose to give to in this world, I hope that FOCUS North America is one that you choose. However, sometimes I think we should address the more basic issue - giving! Why do it and what are the results of it for me? How will giving change me…
Last Updated on Friday, 14 August 2009 05:02 Written by Nick Kasemeotes Wednesday, 24 June 2009 03:40
Many of us have seen the movie “My Big Fat Greek Wedding”. Throughout the movie the father contends that all English words really come from Greek words. This does happen to be the case with the word “philanthropy”. It comes from two Greek words; philo - meaning friendship and anthropos –meaning man or humanity. As a parish priest for 28 years, I confess that at times it was easier to guilt people into giving than to establish a real friendship with them. Sorrowfully, fundraising often takes this approach.
If in fact, philanthropy is a friendship, then it implies that it is a mutually beneficial relationship for both parties. Each person involved enjoys the relationship and is nurtured by it. When we look at the ministry of Christ, we see that in the Gospel of John, He calls His disciples “friends”. We call God in our worship the only Philanthropos, which is the “friend of man”. When He asked the rich young ruler to sell all that he had and give it to the poor and come follow Him, he was not just asking him to part with his possessions; he was inviting Him to become his friend. What is so remarkable about this is that God actually would want and seek our friendship. FOCUS North America is seeking true philanthropists, not in terms of giving great or small amounts, but those who wish to enter into a relationship that will be a blessing to them and the ones who benefit from their giving.
One last thought…I was honored to be at the Gabby Awards last week in Chicago. It was the first ever award ceremony to honor Greek Americans who excelled in so many different fields. One such field was for philanthropy. I thought to myself… all of us will eventually be separated from our wealth...when we are lying out horizontally in our coffins. But no one was handing out awards for that, they were handing out the award to those who had the courage to do it willingly and with joy… they were still vertical, that is still alive and in this world! Next week I want to talk about the effects of giving. Please consider establishing a friendship with FOCUS North America in the true sense of what philanthropy means!
Last Updated on Friday, 14 August 2009 05:05 Written by Nick Kasemeotes Tuesday, 16 June 2009 16:17
The word "charitable giving" is often brought up in the context of "tax deductions", that is, trying to avoid paying more taxes by giving to charity. While this may be one of many reasons we give to charities, it is not the only reason and by no means the most complete. In this blog I hope to explore the true meaning of charity. What are its roots, where did it come from? In the next few weeks, I will look back into the ancient Greek philosophers, the Scriptures, and Holy Tradition of the Orthodox Church and even modern studies to show that the act of giving actually makes us fuller, joyous and God-like human beings. Let's start by defining some terms.
Most Orthodox are familiar with the word "philanthropy". It comes from two Greek words, "philo" meaning "friend" and "anthropos" meaning "man". In the course of the liturgical services of our Church, we often refer to God as "Philanthropos", that is the "friend of Man". The earliest known use of this word occurs in the ancient Greek mythology.
In Prometheus Bound (circa 5th cent B.C.), we find the word "philanthropic" as a description of Prometheus, who "looks kindly" towards humans as opposed to Zeus, who wishes to exterminate them. Next we find mentioned in the 4th century play Peace, the word "philanthropic" is used by humans as flattery to gain the god's favor.
Plato's Symposium (4th century B.C.) uses the word three times, again in reference to the god Eros, who is most "philanthropic" of the gods. In his work Euthyphro, Plato calls to use the word "philanthropic" not as an attribute for a god, but now one for his friend, Socrates.
As the 4th century B.C. continues, we find the word used more and more associated with a number of other civic virtues and leadership qualities such as justice. One should not "appear" as philanthropic just to gain public approval. Soon, philanthropy becomes an innate emotional attachment that people possess towards others.
By the 2nd century B.C. the word "philanthropy" begins to take on a financial aspect. Financial generosity and even "salary" come to be used in the context of the word.
In his paper, On the Meaning of Philanthropy, Classical and Modern, by Marty Sulek (which I reference in this blog) the word "philanthropy" evolves in he following way in ancient Greek writings:
A. Theological - in reference to divine beings;
B. Philosophical - in reference to the status of the knower, knowledge, learning and other associated concepts;
C. Political - in reference to rulers, magistrates and other civic leaders;
D. Scientific - reference to an innate love of, or attraction to, human beings;
E. Fiduciary - in reference to financial generosity.
Question to our bloggers...
Which one best describes your definition the word "philanthropy"?


